Double blind peer review is a method used to make sure scientific publications are produced with the highest quality. This method is fundamental to the objective review of scientific studies and is preferred by many scientific journals. All manuscripts submitted to CUDES are blind reviewed according to the steps below:
Double Blind Peer Review Method
CUDES uses the double blind peer review method in the review process of all studies. In this method the identities of the authors and reviewers are confidential.
Initial Review Process
The studies submitted to CUDES are reviewed by the editors first. At this stage, the studies which are not related with the journal's aim and scope, weak in terms of language and wording, lack originality, contain critical scientific mistakes and do not meet the publishing criteria are rejected. The authors of such studies are informed in two weeks following the submission date. The studies deemed acceptable, on the other hand, are submitted to a field editor related with the subject of study that the work focuses on.
In the pre-review process, the field editors evaluate the introduction and literature, method, findings, results, discussion parts of the studies in detail with respect to the publishing policies and scope of the journal as well as originality. As a result of this process, those studies that are found unacceptable are returned within two weeks the latest together with the field editor report. And the studies which are deemed appropriate are assigned to reviewers.
Reviewers are assigned according to the content of the studies and their subject of expertise. The editor or field editor(s) who reviews the study recommend reviewers, based on their subject of expertise, from the reviewer pool of CUDES or a new reviewer related with the subject of study addressed in the article. Then the studies are passed on to the reviewers who are obligated to guarantee that they will not share any document or detail about the study they review.
In general, the reviewer reports are based on the originality of the studies, methods, ethical considerations, consistent presentation of the findings and results and analysis of the studies with respect to literature. This evaluation is done according to the following:
In the review process, reviewers are not expected to redact the study according to its galley features.
Reviewers are given 3 weeks for review. It is compulsory for the authors to complete the editing of their work within 1 month. Reviewers may ask multiple editing of a study if they deem necessary.
The editor(s) evaluate the review by reviewers within 2 weeks at the latest.
Editorial Board Decision
Based on the review done by the reviewers, editors report the views of the editorial board to the author(s) in a week at the latest along with the suggestions made by reviewers. In this process the studies that are not accepted for publication are returned without request for plagiarism detection. The final decision about the accepted studies is made based on the results of the plagiarism detection report.
How long does the Publication Review Process last?
It is anticipated that the publication review process of the studies submitted to CUDES be completed in 3 months. However, the period during which editors or reviewers ask the author(s) to do editing and the author(s) complete the editing is not included in this time frame.